We use cookies.

To make your experience the best it can be, we use cookies and similar technologies on our site. We need your permission to allow these technologies, which will maximise browsing experience. For more information on how we use cookies and how to change your cookie settings, please see our cookies and privacy policy.

X
CONTACT US

CONTACT US

Please complete this short form to get in touch with a member of our team and we will get back to you as soon as we can.

X
NEWSLETTER

NEWSLETTER

Sign up to our newsletter by completing the form below.

Header image for the current page Using data to enable and measure stewardship-led transformation

Using data to enable and measure stewardship-led transformation

Share this page

By Aaron Atkinson, Associate Director of Business Intelligence at NHS Arden & GEM and Dr Peter Scolding, Clinical Director of Stewardship at Mid and South Essex Integrated Care System.

System-based working demands collaboration but how we do this brings numerous challenges based on existing organisational structures, funding streams and resources.

Some Integrated Care Systems (ICSs) have adopted a stewardship approach which essentially means establishing multidisciplinary, cross-organisational teams to act as responsible stewards or navigators of common resources. Using population health management, stewardship considers the most effective interventions to improve value and deliver the best quality care, moving away from traditional, siloed ways of working. Data stands at the forefront, critical for both enhancing understanding of population needs and rigorously evaluating performance, thereby driving the substantial cultural transformation required.

Data-driven direction

When Mid and South Essex Integrated Care System (MSE ICS) established its first stewardship groups for six key service areas, Arden & GEM worked with the team to establish performance dashboards for each group. These were designed to show performance against the Triple Aim duty as well as metrics to measure the outcomes of each care area, incorporating data from all major providers. Adopting a collaborative, iterative approach to agreeing the specification for these dashboards was as important as the outputs themselves. 

Each of these stewardship groups is now able to track and monitor progress, including activity data, deprivation and demographic breakdowns, and patient outcomes such as improved cancer diagnosis waiting times and targeted support for frail patients. What makes this so crucial are two interlinked elements:

  1. The holistic approach, incorporating multiple data sources across ICS providers providing a true picture to inform decision-making
  2. System-wide access to data that directly demonstrates and validates the stewardship approach.

Using data to understand and transform care

But this is not just about monitoring performance. Improving the quality of data and actively using it to enhance care is what will really drive sustainable change within the NHS and social care, as demonstrated by MSE ICS's Ageing Well stewardship group in its work on improving care for patients with dementia, frailty and adults nearer end of life.

The health and social care stewards across the group quickly identified that outdated datasets were not telling the true story for these patients, who typically represent the largest source of demand across health, mental health and social care. Working with Arden & GEM's BI team, MSE has developed a new data capture methodology to measure best practice quality metrics for frailty, dementia and end-of-life at population health management level from all major providers. Experts, including ICS Ageing Well Stewards, frailty consultants, community teams, primary care and dementia leads have co-created a quality improvement tool called Frailty End-of-Life Dementia Assessment (FrEDA). This HSJ Award-winning tool measures and records frailty and enables delivery of seven high impact personalised care inputs, including falls risk assessment and structured medication reviews.

Alongside FrEDA a single ICS-wide register for frailty was developed - the Electronic Frailty Care Coordination System (eFraCCS). This feeds into an ICS performance dashboard enabling whole system monitoring to drive quality improvement for every provider. FrEDA is now in use across 27 PCNs, community teams, dementia teams, hospices and secondary care. Early results show increased evidence of collaboration across partners with a growing range of referral sources to eFRaCCS as partners utilise the system. 

FrEDA and eFraCCS datasets are driving more proactive care and safer, more appropriate interventions. For example, the Frailty Consultant Hotline (which provides urgent medical support to clinical teams) is using better frailty scoring in urgent care models to enable higher quality clinical diagnosis and decision-making, saving nearly 7,500 bed days in six months.

Supporting drivers of change

Stewardship is still a relatively new approach within ICSs, challenging embedded ways of working that have been in place for years. But just as we are becoming more adept at multidisciplinary working and more accustomed to population health-based collaboration, so we are rapidly advancing our use of data.

Whether it's about understanding the problem, identifying solutions or developing tools which support both, there is no doubt that effective insight and performance management data are crucial for future success. To build trust, we need a shared understanding - a complete picture of the environment we are operating in. To maintain momentum, we need to evidence impact.

Capturing and presenting meaningful data not only bridges gaps between partners but also facilitates a cohesive effort towards achieving the Triple Aim of enhancing patient care experiences, improving population health and ensuring economic sustainability of healthcare services.

You can read the full version of this blog on Healthcare Leader.