With evidence that a significant proportion of acute hospital admissions are avoidable, healthcare commissioners and providers throughout the country are continually searching for effective initiatives that avoid unnecessary emergency admissions.
Wolverhampton Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) introduced a 12 week ‘step up care service’ pilot to achieve this aim. The CCG needed to ensure that not only did the pilot service meet its primary objective but it could also demonstrate clinical compliance, appropriate patient care and cost effectiveness.
Arden & GEM designed and produced an evaluation process using both qualitative and quantitative analysis. As a result of the evaluation report, the step up care service has now been commissioned on an ongoing basis with all recommendations accepted to ensure successful future development.
Avoidable acute hospital admissions can have serious repercussions for bed occupancy and planned (elective) treatments. Healthcare commissioners and providers throughout the country are continually trying to introduce initiatives that avoid unnecessary emergency admissions.
In January 2017, Wolverhampton CCG commenced a ‘step up care service’ pilot to provide care to patients where current services were unable to support them in their own home due to a health crisis but an acute admission was not medically required.
The service was able to take advantage of unused capacity available within an existing step down block contract with a local nursing home. The commissioner and provider agreed to a three month pilot period, after which a thorough evaluation would be completed before making long term decisions about the future provision of the service.
Arden & GEM was tasked with completing a service evaluation. Our Specialist Strategic Service Improvement team utilised our tried and tested evaluation methodology to design a process, consisting of both qualitative and quantitative analysis, to determine:
A range of qualitative information was collated through interviewing the rapid intervention team (service referral point), the commissioned GP with responsibility for the care home, CCG staff and care home staff.
A quantitative review took place covering:
The CCG was fully informed and involved on the progress of the evaluation via a series of meetings and briefings. By working closely together, project barriers could quickly and readily be identified and overcome.
A full evaluation report was completed on behalf of Wolverhampton CCG. As a consequence of the evaluation findings, the step up care service has now been fully commissioned
While the primary objective of the step up care service was to limit the significant impact that avoidable admissions place upon bed occupancy and finances, the evaluation was able to estimate direct cost savings achieved by the pilot of £14,000.
A series of recommendations was made to improve the quality and efficiency of the service covering clarity of role and responsibilities, clinical review, training requirements and value for money.
In particular, the stakeholder interviews identified a number of service enhancements – from supporting an e-learning programme to assigning a care home physiotherapist – which have all been accepted and actioned by the commissioner and provider.
The recommendations made for improvement will ensure that the service continues to develop to meet the needs of patients while better fulfilling its aim of avoiding unnecessary admissions to acute care.
The Arden & GEM Programme Manager was very professional and very competent. He kept me fully informed of progress and we met and discussed next steps on a regular basis.
The draft stages of the evaluation report were received on time with all additional comments acknowledged, discussed and actioned where appropriate.
The final report was incredibly detailed, informative and very well received by our Board who were able to make an immediate decision regarding commissioning the service fully.
Karen Evans, Solutions and Transformation Manager, Wolverhampton CCG
My practice reviewed the list of highest risk stratified patients against our own list of patients at risk of unplanned admissions. We found 27 patients who had a risk of 75% or greater of a hospital admission in the next 6 months who were effectively ‘off our radar’. We have now added these patients to our proactive care list.